What is the damage that pamphlets, magazines and newspapers are doing to the planet?

Please watch this video produced by the Environmental Paper Network.

Disclaimer about the information presented here

The following information is our thoughts on the topic, and is to be treated as an opinion. The information is a collection of freely available information on the internet, and although we fully believe that paper consumption through pamphlet, magazine and newspaper creation is mostly unnecessary and a polluter of the environment, we do not take responsibility for the accuracy of the information quoted and presented here as we didn’t participate in the research of these 'facts'. The information is used purely to provide evidence to support the argument.

Why do we think paper flyers, magazines and newspapers are unnecessary?

Our reasons are:

  1. They are a waste of energy and resources.
  2. That the internet exists and the information on the flyers, magazines or newspapers could be supplied through this medium.
  3. That the only reason this doesn't happen, is because a universal system which everyone participates in and allows everyone a simple, high quality, and fair delivery platform hasn't been established. (After all, the local posty delivers letters to your letterbox. We don't question it. There is one system which we all use)

The first question that comes to mind

Is paper carbon neutral? Please read the Document 'Carbon neutral paper, fact or fiction?' from EPN (Environmental Paper Network)

Land fill stats

The landfill statistics from the statistics provided by SWAP Baseline Programme, NZ Government (View source) didn't show conclusive information about the exact impact the reduction in flyers and newspapers would make to the environment. The average percentage of paper disposed of in the sample landfills varied. For example in Dunedin, the Green Island landfill varied from 3% up to as high as 10%. But, it is apparently safe to think that the recycling systems put in place have had an effect as the amount appears to be reducing. This isn't the case however at all landfills.

Month/Year
Total tonne of rubbish
Percentage paper waste
Tonne of paper waste
December 2002
45,000
9.3%
4,185
February 2003
45,000
7.3%
3,285
May 2003
35,000
8.3%
2,905
October 2003
35,000
6.3%
2,205
February 2004
35,000
4.1%
1,435
May 2004
35,000
3.4%
1,190
       

Land fill stats not the only facts, so what do we need?

Further studies in waste at the Green Island Landfill in 2007 - 2008 showed that an average of 3% of the waste disposed of was paper. This information is not conclusive as an example of what the actual carbon foot print of the pamphlet, magazine and newspaper industry has in NZ because it doesn't show:

  • What the types of paper disposed of are. Are they large newspapers, small or local or property sales newspapers, magazines, letterbox pamphlets, organisational newsletters?
  • How many individual pamphlets where made?
  • What is the carbon foot print of each unit type?
  • How many units were recycled, or made from recycled material?

The observation from these statistics is that they don't show what we need to know. We need to know how many pamphlets a household gets per year and what the average weight of these would be, and as such what the carbon foot print of this is at a nationwide level. At this stage, having not collected an entire years worth of pamphlets at a selection of houses throughout NZ, we can only take an educated guess at this figure, and plan to assess this more accurately at a later date.

1996, 2001 and 2006 Censuses
  1996 2001 2006
Private Occupied Dwellings 1,276,332 1,359,843 1,471,746
Growth from previous Census   6.543% growth 8.2291% growth
  • There were 4,027,947 people who usually live (usual residents) in New Zealand on 2006 census night.
  • There were 1,471,746 private occupied dwellings counted in the 2006 Census, an increase of 111,903 (8.2 percent) since the 2001 Census.
  • New Zealand's private occupied dwelling count has increased by 195,414 (15.3 percent) in the 10 years to March 2006.

The Carbon foot print

If you use the latest growth figure of 8.2291% over 5 years, the current dwellings in 2009 is approximately 1,544,412 dwellings containing 4,226,825 residents. This is an average of 2.736 people per house. The example below has been worked out at 4.25 metric tonnes of emissions in carbon dioxide equivalent per tonne of product for 100% virgin paper as per the report from the EPN. The paper used for pamphlet and newspaper is probably not '100% virgin paper' but also take in to account the foot print for the paper does not include the printing of the paper, the poution created by the staff driving to work and back everyday, power generation for the machines used to print, the delivery to the letterbox on a nationwide scale, etc

Figures below for different types of publications are based on what was received on certain days at a Dunedin residence, then multiplied out for every residence in NZ, then the footprint statistic is calculated using the EPN footprint for 100% virgin paper (as mentioned above):

Date
Product
The weight (grams)
Average per
unit (grams)
Estimated weight nationally (tonne)
Daily total (tonne)
National carbon foot print estimate (tonne)
Carbon footprint.
If every week was same as this week through out the year IE estimated yearly total (tonne)
  Test week 1          
19/10/2009 -            
20/10/2009
5 Flyers
90
18
138.997
 
1 local newspaper
60
60
92.664
231.661
984.195
21/10/2009 1 local newspaper
70
70
108.114
108.114
459.485
22/10/2009 1 local newspaper
100
100
154.441
154.441
656.375
23/10/2009 1 property paper
170
170
262.55
262.55
1,115.837
24/10/2009 4 flyers
145
36.25
223.94
223.94
951.745
 
25/10/2009 -            
       
Weekly Total
756.766
4,167.637
216,717.124
  Test week 2        
26/10/2009 -            
27/10/2009 7 Flyers
220
31
339.77
     
  1 local paper
60
60
92.664
432.434
1,837.844
 
28/10/2009 1 local paper
80
80
123.553
123.553
525.1
 
29/10/2009 4 flyers
80
20
123.553
  1 local paper
115
115
177.607
301.16
1,279.93
 
30/10/2009 1 toy catalogue
60
60
92.664
   
  1 property paper
170
170
262.55
355.214
1,509.66
 
31/10/2009 1 coupon book, 7 flyers
300
37.5
463.324
463.324
1,969.127
 
1/11/2009              
 
Weekly Total
1675.685
7,121.661
370,326.372

These figure don't include the main local paper. It only includes the small free ones. The ten year carbon foot print based from the figures for the week 26/10/2009 to the 1/11/2009 (our worst example) is 3,703,263.72 tonnes of Carbon dioxide produced which could be avoided if we went digital. This however is not the only pollution from this process. The full list of other pollutants from papers' full life cycle, with health and environmental impacts include:

  • carbon monoxide
  • nitrogen oxides (NOx) which contribute to acid rain and
    cause lung damage and respiratory illness
  • particulate matter (PM) which forms haze (smog) that
    reduces visibility
  • sulfur dioxide (SO2) which also contributes to acid rain
    and causes respiratory illness
  • volatile organic compounds (VOCs) which react with
    nitrogen oxides to form ozone as well as a variety of
    human illnesses
  • and ozone, which forms smog.

Summary

In conclusion, if we didn't create flyers, magazines and newspapers with paper and we viewed them over the internet then we would have a dramatically smaller foot print. After all, we already have computers running to check email, chat online to friends, send pictures around the world, have video calls, and watch TV, etc.

To make a difference <<< JOIN NOW FOR FREE >>>

 

 
 
 
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Bookmark and Share Contact us | Disclaimer | All Content Protected, FLYERS2U COPYRIGHT 2009, All Rights Reserved